How to reframe client expectations
If the risk conversation isn’t adequately communicated, a market downturn can cause your clients to flood your offices with calls like these: “Are we going to be OK or should we move to cash?” Meanwhile, during an unexpected bull market like we saw in 2023, those same clients call in asking: “Why am I not beating the market?”
That’s where a proper risk conversation comes into play. According to Klein, clients just want to know what’s normal for their portfolio.
“That’s where it’s important to frame the conversation around a six-month 95% range,” said Klein. “That range is the likely span of gains or losses a portfolio might experience over a six-month period within a 95% confidence interval,” or within two standard deviations of the mean in statistical parlance.
For example, over the last 30 years, the Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio achieved an 8.05% compound annual return with a 9.63% standard deviation. In other words, you can tell clients that given their asset allocation and risk parameters, 95% of the time their 60/40 portfolio is expected to return 8% on average (plus or minus 19.25%). As a result, 95% of their portfolio will return between +27.25% and -11.25%. Going back to 1986, there was only one year in which the 60/40 portfolio met or exceeded +27% (1993) and only four times when it returned less than -11% (1990, 2002, 2008, 2022, see chart below). Source: Backtest by Curvo
The 5% left over is a statistical standard of downside risk that can’t be quantified and includes Black Swans, unforeseeable market events, wars, or a natural disaster, and represents a devastating loss for the client. However after thorough testing in different market environments, less than 1% of portfolios have actually dipped into that 5% devastation range.
The 5% outlier range is something we can’t control, but the 95% interval is something we can control by setting realistic expectations for clients. When you do, they’re more likely to hang tough when the markets are volatile.